Alternatively, you can register/login faster using
 
Register Free!
 
CAT 2018 Slot 2 Analysis
 

CAT 2018 Slot 2 Analysis

TestFunda ,  27-Nov-18
The second slot examination for CAT 2018 was conducted on 25 Nov between 2.30 p.m. and 5.30 p.m.

Based on feedback from our students and faculty, we compared the difficulty of each section:

Section

Compared to CAT 2017

Compared to CAT 2018 Slot I

VARC

Easy

At Par

DILR

Marginally Easy

Marginally Tough

QA

Significantly Tough

Marginally Tough


The overall test taking experience was similar in terms of logistics to the previous years. Though glitches were reported from a few centres, the overall experience was smooth for most students. Apart from the admit card and one photo-ID proof, no other object was allowed in the computer lab. So you had to be careful of leaving your valuable outside. However, slot 2 students would have had some advantage as they would have had a chance to know the arrangements based on slot and make provisions accordingly. The scratch pad given during the test and the admit card were both taken away at the end of the test.
 
The test interface was similar to last year. Like CAT 2015, all the RC questions were together (1-24), but were not represented as a separate section. These were followed by the 10 non-RC questions. Like CAT 2017, the DILR sets had a mix of MCQ and NE type questions. 

The calculator provided was a simple calculator, rather than a scientific one. One addition to the interface was the presence of a watermark with the candidate’s registration number behind the text on the screen. This was marginally distracting, especially if you had to be scroll up and down for a long RC or DILR set. The overall interface replicated the official CAT player provided by the CAT authorities

Overall Breakup

Section

Section Name

MCQ

NE (TITA)

Total

Difficulty

I

Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension

27

7

34

Easy

II

Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning

24

8

32

Moderate to Tough

III

Quantitative Ability

22

12

34

Moderate


Section I – Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension
  • LOD – Easy to Moderate
  • A major change was that CAT 2018 moved the structure of RCs from 3 and 6-question passages to 5 and 4-question passages. The overall breakup was : 4 RCs of 5 questions each and 1 RC of 4 questions each.
  • The other question types – Jumbled Sentences, Paragraph Summary and Contextual Odd Man Out questions – were similar to previous CATs. Like CAT 2017, the Paragraph Summaries were MCQs and on the tougher side. 
  • The RCs were mainly in the 450-550 word length range and based on contemporary issues. Hence, they were readable. Though most questions were inferential in nature, they were relatively easy as options could be eliminated. 
  • The Jumbled Sentences were easy while Contextual Odd Man Out questions were easy to moderate.    
  • RC topics ranged from socially relevant topics (fallacy of meritrocacy, technology in government services, defects of metrics) to anthropology (migration of snails) and science (rings of Saturn). 
  • Like the first slot, it was possible to attempt 28 to 30 questions with high accuracy.  26 attempts with 80 percent accuracy could fetch 95 percentile, and 30 attempts at similar accuracy could get around 99 percentile.
Section II: Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning
  • LOD – Moderate to Tough
  • The section was slightly easier compared to CAT 2017 but slightly tougher than the first slot. 
  • Like CAT 2017, the sets had a mix of both MCQ and NE questions. Some of the sets were a combination of both LR and DI, though their proportion was slightly less this year. 
  • Selection of the right set was critical to maximizing your attempts. There were 2-3 sets that could be classified as easy to moderate while the rest were moderate to tough. So you had to be choosy in your attempts. 
  • The sets on arrangement of students in three rooms, sales and profits on mobile handsets and sales of tickets as per categories were the easiest ones. The conventional three-set Venn had two easy and two moderately tough questions. The set on coding was tricky and could have wasted your time. 
  • It was possible to attempt 16-18 questions in this section to get a 98 percentile or above.
Section III - Quantitative Ability 
  • LOD – Moderate
  • Unlike CAT 2015, CAT 2016 and CAT 2017, the QA section was definitely tougher compared to the previous three years. There were fewer sitters and easy questions. 
  • A key feature of the questions this year was that a number of questions tested a mixture of concepts. So, candidates had to qualitatively know the significance of various properties and concepts, and apply them accordingly. 
  • The section was dominated by Arithmetic (8 questions), followed by Algebra (8 questions) and then Geometry and Modern Maths (6 questions each). 
  • Solving 18-20 questions with 85-90% accuracy would be a good performance of this section. 
On the whole, both the morning and evening slots of CAT were similar, as well similar to CAT 2017. However, individually the difficulty level of sections varied. A redeeming feature for students was that no new question types were reported. 

An overall performance of 64-66 questions with 85-90% accuracy can be considered a good performance for this slot. 

Knowledge Partner – IMS Learning Resources
Other resources by TestFunda
Related Resources on this topic
Report Abuse


 
 
©2008-2018 All rights reserved