Alternatively, you can register/login faster using
 
Register Free!
 
MHCET 2016 Analysis
 

MHCET 2016 Analysis

TestFunda ,  10-May-16
MHCET, traditionally the last exam of the season was conducted over three slots in two days on 12th and 13th March 2016. The paper comprised 200 questions to be solved in 150 minutes (2.5 hours). Unlike last year, this year there was no issue both in terms of the quality and correctness of questions. Since the exam was conducted by IBPS, the flavor and style of quite a few questions was like some of the tougher bank exams. Also they used their own interface, which all MBA aspirants may not have been familiar with. 

There were two major changes in MHCET compared to last year.

1. The exam was divided into sections for the first time ever. The four sections were,

        -  Test of Logical Reasoning (Verbal/Critical).
-  Test of Abstract Reasoning.
-  Test of Quantitative Ability. 
-  Test of Verbal Ability.

2. All question had five options instead of four options like last year. Here, MHCET went back to its original pattern. 

Summary

Total Marks

200

Number of Questions

200

Total Time

150 minutes

Number of Sections

4

Options

5

Number of Questions

Test of Logical Reasoning = 75
Test of Abstract Reasoning = 25

Test of Quantitative Ability = 50

Test of Verbal Ability = 50

Negative Marking

No



Test of Logical Reasoning (Verbal/Critical)

The section had 75 questions of which approximately 58-60 questions were non-verbal and 15-17 questions were based on verbal reasoning.
 
Non-verbal Reasoning:-

Topic

No. of questions

Level of difficulty

Remark

Linear arrangement

6

Moderate

12 people in two rows facing each other

Linear arrangement

6

Difficult

7 people in one row some facing south and some north

Circular arrangement

7

Difficult

Facing inwards + family tree

Scheduling

7

Difficult

Three parameters (Names, days and country)

Floors

6

Moderate

People sitting on 9 floors

Inequalities

5

Easy-Moderate

No codes

Sentence coding

5

Easy

4 statements with 4 words

Sequential output tracing

6

Moderate-Difficult

Input of 12 elements with 6 words and 6 numbers

Data sufficiency

5

Difficult

Arrangements based, family and direction based

Miscellaneous

5

Easy-Moderate

Directions based and family tree


VerbalReasoning:-

Topic

No. of questions

Level of difficulty

Remark

Syllogism

6

Easy-Moderate

3 statements and 2 conclusions like possibility based

Strengthen-weaken argument

1

Moderate

 

Conclusion based

1

Easy

 

Assumption based

1

Easy-Moderate

 

Cause-effect

1

Difficult

 

Inference

1

Easy-Moderate

 

Critical reasoning

6

Easy-Moderate

 


In this section, considering amount of timerequired data sufficiency and arrangement sets, one should not prefer them tosolve first. This section was difficult overall. A well-prepared student couldhave attempted 40-45 questions in 60 minutes.

Test of Abstract Reasoning

 The section had 25 questions, as shownbelow:

Topic

No. of questions

Level of difficulty

Remark

Series completion

15-17

Easy-Moderate

First or last term and intermediate term

Analogies

8-10

Easy-Moderate

 


There were no questions on interchange or oddman out this year. Also, SSC CGL type questions like paper folding, mirrorimage etc also were not there. This section was easy-moderate in terms ofdifficulty level. A well prepared student could have attempted 18-20 questionsin 25 minutes.

Test of Quantitative Ability

The section had 50 questions of whichapproximately 20 were DI based and the rest were QA based. 

Topic

No. of questions

Level of difficulty

Remark

Table

5

Difficult

Mixture of Percentage and Numerical data in one table

Pie chart

5

Moderate-Difficult

Two data points with values in terms of percentages

Line graph

5

Moderate-Difficult

Single line graph with arithmetic concept (CP-SP)

Caselets

5

Difficult

2 parameter

Data Sufficiency

5

Difficult

Arithmetic based, geometry based

Quantitative comparison

5

Moderate-Difficult

Geometry based, number based

Odd man out

5

Difficult

Numbers based

Arithmetic

12

Moderate

T/W, TSD, P&L, Linear equation, ratio etc.

Geometry

2

Moderate

Triangles, circles

Modern maths

1

Moderate-Difficult

Probability


Inthis section, the DI sets were calculation intensive as well as conceptuallytricky. However, it was possible to attempt a couple of these sets easily. Theodd man out questions were “hit or miss” types and could have been left for theend. Apart from 1-2 questions in QA, the remaining were on the easier side. Thissection was moderate to difficult in terms of difficulty level. On the whole, awell-prepared student could have attempted 30-35 questions in 45 minutes.

Test of Verbal Ability

The section had 50 questions of which 10questions were of RC and 40 questions of verbal ability. 

Topic

No. of questions

Level of difficulty

Remark

Reading comprehension

10

Moderate

2 passages of 5 questions each

Vocabulary

5

Moderate-Difficult

Either Synonym or Antonym

Faulty Construction,

5

Easy-Moderate

Basic grammar, usage and spelling errors

Mark the Error

5

Easy-Moderate

 

Cloze Passage

10

Moderate

Either 1 passage of 10 blanks or 2 passages of 5 blanks each

Jumbled Paragraph

5

Easy-Moderate

6 statements

Sentence starter/joiner

5

Difficult

2 statements to be combined using 1 or more of given 3 fragments

Central idea/ Out of context

5

Moderate-Difficult

 


In this section, the question types thatshould have been attempted last were reading comprehension and sentencestarter/joiner. This section was moderate in terms of difficulty level. Awell-prepared student could have easily attempted 30-35 questions in 20 minutes.

 Final verdict

Overall MHCET 2016 was more or less onstandard lines of MHCET 2014 and a substantial number of questions could havebeen attempted by a well-prepared student. Overall, a good attempt would bearound 140-145 questions with accuracy of 85-90%.

 Exam interface

 Asmentioned earlier, exam was conducted by IBPS this year, leading to somechanges in the interface.

Some of the salientfeatures of this new interface were:

·        Thequestion palette with all 200 question numbers on right hand side of the screenwas smaller than last year.

·        As MHCETfeatured sections this year, there were tabs for each section on the left handtop of the screen through which you could toggle from one section to the other.

·        There was noway to track your sectional attempts, although you could keep a tab on how manyquestions had been attempted by you overall.

·        The lefthand side of the screen was split into two parts. The left part had the commondata or the instructions whereas the right part had the individual questiondata and the options.

·        However,the data for the questions was shown in a such a way that you had to first keepscrolling right and left to see all the figures (especially in Visual Reasoningquestions) and then keep scrolling up and down to read the options. This layoutwas reported by candidates on Saturday, but did not seem to be the case onSunday.

·        Thequality of the figures was not good – lines were blurred and slightly tiltedimages etc.

·        Unlikelast year, there was no option to see the whole question paper at one go. Thisdrastically affected candidates’ planning and strategy since it becamedifficult to figure out at the start how many grouped questions were in thepaper.

·        For groupedquestions, there was no way to directly find out the number of questions inthat set. You had to keep going forward to find this out and plan your attempt.  



Other resources by TestFunda
Related Resources on this topic
Report Abuse


 
 
©2008-2017   Enabilon Learning Private Limited. All rights reserved